After thoroughly reviewing my technical description final draft, I would grade myself as follows:Inclusion of Required Genre Elements (20/20): All required elements were included and effectively integrated. The introduction provided a clear overview, the background information was comprehensive, the detailed descriptions were thorough, and the diagrams were relevant and well-placed.The conclusion succinctly summarized the key points. I began my technical description with a concise introduction that outlines the subject of the document and its relevance. I ensured that readers understand the purpose of my description by explicitly stating it in the opening paragraph, which aligns with the assignment’s guidelines for a clear purpose. I made a deliberate effort to use accurate technical terms while ensuring they are defined where necessary. This not only adhered to the assignment’s requirement for precise terminology but also helped achieve clarity for readers who may not be familiar with every term. I believe this element was crucial in maintaining the professional tone and credibility of the document. The assignment sheet emphasized the importance of a logical flow. To meet this requirement, I structured the document in a clear, step-by-step manner. Each section builds on the previous one, guiding the reader through the material in a way that minimizes confusion. Subheadings were used to break down sections, making the description easy to follow.Adherence to Section Purposes (18/20): Each section fulfilled its intended purpose, though there were minor areas where additional detail could have enhanced the explanation. Overall, the sections were well-aligned with the guidelines provided in the assignment sheet and readings.Use of Citations (15/15): Citations were correctly formatted and used appropriately throughout the document. Both in-text citations and the bibliography were complete and adhered to the required citation style.Appropriateness of Tone and Language (14/15): The tone was consistently formal, and the language was precise. There were a few instances where word choice could have been more specific, but these did not significantly detract from the overall quality.Clarity of Writing (13/15): The writing was generally clear and concise, with only a few minor grammatical errors. These errors were not pervasive and did not impede understanding.Revisions Between Drafts (8/10): Significant improvements were made between drafts, particularly in terms of organization and detail. However, some feedback points could have been addressed more thoroughly. Timeliness of Submission (10/10): The document was submitted on time, demonstrating good time management and adherence to deadlines. Overall, I believe my technical description final draft deserves a grade of 98 out of 100. This reflects a strong adherence to the assignment requirements, effective use of citations, appropriate tone and language, clear writing, substantial revisions, and timely submission.